Saturday, June 21, 2008

Freshwater tainted in Mount Vernon

It started at least 11 years ago but came to a head last April. John Freshwater has been a science teacher at Mount Vernon Middle School in Mount Vernon, Ohio for 21 years. Actually, he's been kind of a science teacher. He's also been teaching his fundamentalist version of Christianity, and knocking the theory of evolution.

In his classroom, Freshwater, led by Jesus, posted a copy of the Ten Commandments on his door, as well as other religious posters on his walls, and placed copies of the Bible around his room. On his desk he kept a well-worn copy of his "personal" Bible.

The Mount Vernon School District told Freshwater to remove the Ten Commandments poster and the other posters and place his Bible out of sight. He took down the posters, but kept his personal Bible on his desk.

Dave Daubenmire, a Christian Right extremist who heads up an organization called "Minutemen United," defended Freshwater, claiming "This is not a religion issue; this is a free-speech issue. He didn't take the Bible to read to anybody."

Freshwater, in a news release, said "Thousands of citizens in this community have built their lives on deeply held religious convictions, and it is for them I stand today."

He also stated that "That Bible is me. I want my Bible on my desk because that is me."


Ah, but there's much more to this than Freshwater's Bible on his desk. Although he claims to be a science teacher, he is, in fact, more of fundamentalist preacher. Even Daubenmire admitted that Freshwater "has taught his students about the 'holes in evolution' and intelligent design."

Freshwater also provided Creationism pamphlets for his students.

God, Freshwater insists, is responsible for creation. "In one class, Freshwater used Lego pieces to describe the beginning of the world. He dumped the pieces, then asked students if the Legos could assemble by themselves."

(That would seem to indicate that in spite of his Bible on his desk, Freshwater is Biblically illiterate. In the book of Genesis, God is said to have created from nothing: "When God began to create heaven and earth--the earth being unformed and void, with darkness over the surface of the deep and a wind from God sweeping over the water--God said, 'Let there be light"; and there was light. ... ")


The Freshwater taint spread and finally the school district decided to hire an independent firm to investigate the allegations against him. Superintendent Steve Short issued a statement on April 22, which said "The allegations against Mr. Freshwater are very serious. This is not about his personal Bible on his desktop. It is about the totality of his conduct."

Short also said that Freshwater is alleged to advance religion in his classroom and teach his personal beliefs about the Bible and ignores the approved curriculum.

A family suing the school district because Freshwater burned their child, said in a fax from their attorney that, "We are religious people, but we were offended when Mr. Freshwater burned a cross onto the arm of our child. This was done in science class in December 2007, where an electric shock machine was used to burn our child. The burn was severe enough that our child awoke that night with severe pain, and the cross remained there for several weeks. ... We have tried to keep this a private matter and hesitate to tell the whole story to the media for fear that we will be retaliated against."

Of course they will. They're up against fundamentalist Christians who have god on their side!

Other allegations against Freshwater are that he conducted prayers and participated in a healing session while a monitor for a meeting of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. This is against school policy and federal law--teachers monitoring these kinds of groups may not participate or offer prayers!

Perhaps the most serious complain against Freshwater was that he had used "an electrostatic device to burn crosses onto students' arms."


The firm of HR on Call, hired by the school district to investigate the allegations against Freshwater, worked for all of May and most of June and have now issued their findings, part of which follows:

1. Mr. Freshwater did burn a cross onto the complaining family's child's arm using an electrostatic device not designed for that purpose. While there did not appear to be any intent by Mr. Freshwater to cause injury to any student, he was not using the device for its intended purpose. Contrary to Mr. Freshwater's statement he simply made an "X" not a "cross," all of the students described the marking as a "cross" and the pictures provided depict a "cross."

(Note that Mr. Freshwater lied!)

2. The Ten Commandments together with other posters of a religious nature were posted in Mr. Freshwater's classroom. Most were removed after Mr. White's letter of April 14, 2008, but at least one poster remained which Mr. Freshwater was again instructed to remove on April 16, 2008, but did not do so.

3. Several Bibles were kept in Mr. Freshwater's classroom including his personal Bible on his desk and one he checked out of the library placed on the lab table near his desk. Other Bibles that had been maintained in the room were removed by the time the investigators viewed Mr. Freshwater's room.

4. Mr. Freshwater engaged in teaching of a religious nature, teaching creationism and related theories and calling evolution into question. He had other materials in his classroom that could be used for that purpose.

5. Mr. Freshwater engaged in prayer during FCA (Fellowship of Christian Athletes) meetings in violation of the district's legal obligations for monitoring such organizations.

6. Mr. Freshwater participated and possibly led a prayer during an FCA meeting that concerned a guest speaker's health. There is no conclusion as to whether such a prayer was a 'healing prayer.'

7. There is no evidence Mr. Freshwater made statements about FCA members "being the saved ones" nor was their any corroboration to the allegation Mr. Freshwater gave FCA members Bibles for them to distribute. He did have two boxed of Bibles in the back of his room.

8. Mr. Freshwater gave an extra credit assignment for students to view the movie "Expelled" which does involve intelligent design.


Linda Weston, the district's director of teaching and learning, indicated to the investigators that she had been with the district for 11 years and has had to deal with a number of complaints about Mr. Freshwater from fellow teachers, his students, and parents during that time. She said she had reported these incidents to the proper officials but they took no action.

Science teachers at the Mount Vernon High School have said that Freshwater has been so negligent in his teaching of evolution they were forced to re-teach the subject to his students when they arrived at the high school.


Yesterday, the school board voted 5-0 to fire Mr. Freshwater. "Board president Ian Watson said the board will proceed with termination at its meeting on July 7, unless Freshwater files a written request for a hearing within 10 days of receiving notice of the board's intent to fire him."

But even before the school board published its decision, threats were in the air. Minutemen United have threatened and now followed through on launching a petition to recall the entire school board. Daubenmire, founder of Minutemen United and Freshwater's friend claimed the whole thing was a "witch hunt."

You can read more about Minutemen United here. A fairly typical, though more activist Christian Right group, they claim to "have set Jesus as their standard of behavior and source of wisdom." Actually, they wouldn't know Jesus if he bounced off their heads!

Their petition is unlikely to have much of an impact, other than further dividing the community - but you know, they're just following Jesus' example!


A couple of thoughts. This Freshwater clown should have been fired years ago. The Bible on his desk was thought by some to be a minor thing, but I'm not so sure. It would be a very powerful symbol to middle school students, and a conflicting one. It was a message to his students! How should they react to this very religious person? What did he want from them? Should they, too, carry a Bible? Should they believe what he says about the Bible? A decent human being would have immediately placed the Bible in his desk. By refusing to do so, he should have been fired!

If he did not want to teach evolution, the honest thing would have been for him to quit and find a job in a parochial school where he could teach creationism/intelligent design. It was deceitful to use his cover as a science teacher to fill the minds of gullible students with fundamentalist Christian beliefs. For that deceit, he should have been fired!

He lied about the cross. For burning a cross into a student's arm he should have been fired. For lying about it he should have been fired.


It is fascinating to me that so many fundamentalist Christians like Tom DeLay, Bill Frist, George Bush, David Vitter, Jim Bakker, etc., lie so easily. The Freshwater investigation team must have known that because Freshwater lied about the cross burnt into the student's arm, he would lie about his FCA participation. If Freshwater could have been trusted to tell the truth, all they would have had to do was ask him, "Did you offer a prayer for healing?"

So the Freshwater case wasn't merely a minor squabble between a teacher and his administrators. He was about a man who engaged in a long-term pattern of lies and deceit in order to press upon his students, not the science he was supposed to be teaching, but his personal religious views.

If he was an honest man, he would slink off into the shadows and seek a position where he was authorized to teach his fundamentalist Christian views.

Because he is not an honest man, we'll no doubt be treated to his appeal and more accusations that his dismissal is the result of a "witch hunt" only because he is a Christian.

Barf!

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

i have to agree with you..it's getting really crazy out there...i believe you hit the right tone and was very good at putting your point accross.

Anonymous said...

Freshwater's acts were no doubt unchristian. He indeed took his personal opinions to the level of coercion and deserves consequences for those actions. Unfortunately I have also seen the same level of dishonesty in so called “devout Christians”. This does not however cause me to condemn Christianity.
In fact the very existence of eco-terrorists (often Darwinian in persuasion) is evidence of the fact that extremists exist in all camps.
Now, religion aside for a moment. How is it that creationism and evolution cannot be taught side by side? Is the evolutionist camp so insecure as to be afraid of the ideas of intelligent design or creationism? The fact is that evolution is as much a matter of faith as creationism is. Both ideas involve assumptions. The important question is: does one accept the assumptions of a given idea and therefore the idea itself. As for me, until the person who personally witnessed the beginning of life on earth steps forth and provides infallible evidence to the fact of evolution as the creative force in biological development, then the mechanism of development and the origin of species is, in truth, based on assumptions. If I understand science correctly, it is the pursuit of disproving hypotheses until enough disproofs emerge to generate a theory and then enough theories converge to form a law. Is evolution not a theory? Are there not assumptions underlying that theory? To assume that a scientist can embark upon any study with complete unbiased is in fact dishonesty as well as is the act of pushing evolution as the singular explanation of life on earth. Furthermore, the assertion that eight grade students are so impressionable comes as an insult to young people, who's ability to reason and process information is being called into question by those who would push only one idea.

Lowell said...

Dear Anonymous...

"...evolution is as much a matter of faith as creationism."

I'll bet you were home-schooled and went to a Christian Bible "College," or such.

You need to read some real scientists and learn the difference between a scientific theory and religious dogma.

Jacob

Anonymous said...

One is not condemning Christianity by condemning stupidity or the vile practices of sexually abusive priests, ministers etc Condemnation of behavior is not condemnation of a faith. If all Christians would act out the demands of their faith, perhaps the world would have avoided mass killings, rapes, wars, crimes etc. sometimes perpetrated in the name of faith. The Crusades, the Inquisition, the Holocaust were all committed by people claiming to be Christians. the jails are full of Christians that somehow manage ot ignore the teaching they profess to believe. I venture the same can be said to some degree about most religions and people that claim to follow the teaching of their religion. It is frequently used as a cover by unscrupulous people that are liars and hypocrites. People frequently tell us how moral they are, but their actions prove differently. Lying and violating laws is not Christian philosophy but is preached by people claiming to be religious. They seem to use their professions of faith to cover up bad behavior. Judge by actions not words! The Roman Catholic Church has suffered badly by the actions of a few (percentage wise, of course). The numbers of preachers that have sinned is legion but that does not mean all preachers are sinners. Look beyond what they say, while taking your money,
Re how life began: Creation assumes a beginning. How, what or who created God? What was there before the first cell and how did it begin? In the beginning means the first but we do not know what came first as we cannot visualize Nothing where now there is something. That takes faith or the ability to say “I do not know the answer. The scientist calls it the first cell; people of faith call it God. Neither can answer the question so why argue about it. Accept a difference of opinion or even semantics and get on with life.
Bob Poris

opinions powered by SendLove.to