The Sacramento Bee tells the story of a "song team" from Rio Americano High School which performed a dance routine at a "back-to-school rally."
Evidently, some 17-year old child became so shook up at what he considered an exhibition of excessive sexuality, he wrote an op-ed for the school's newspaper to blow off the steam that had built up in his innards.
Now, consider that none of the 50 parents in attendance complained. Consider also that the girls "were modestly dressed in loose-fitting light pink blouses, full-length pants and sneakers. Consider further that the principal of the school, Brian Ginter, said: "What our girls did at their dance routine wasn't really anything different than I've seen in dance routines across the country."
FAUX News didn't agree with Principal Ginter. On the O'Reilly show, two dimwitted pundits, Margaret Hoover and Gretchen Carlson, saw an opportunity to get some headlines. Hoover claimed that dancing girls "...were overtly sexual. What do you call spreading your legs and shaking your booty?"
Omigod! I wonder if these two morons watch any of the shows on the FAUX network? The spreading of fully-clad legs and covered booties by a few dancers would seem rather mild up against mostly naked bodies climbing all over each other in and out of bed, the latter being pretty much a staple of prime-time TV these days.
I'm not complaining. I'm calling FAUX News, the O'Reilly show and Hoover and Carlson hypocritical opportunists!
Perhaps it is time we remember Bill O'Reilly's sexual predator moves of the not-so-distant past. Five years ago yesterday a producer by name of Andrea Mackris filed a sexual harrassment suit against O'Reilly.
It was settled out of court (for big bucks, we heard) two weeks later.
But the story didn't end there. And the truth came out. It was about phone sex with O'Reilly on the giving end and Mackris on the receiving end. O'Reilly spoke of vibrators, threesomes, Bill's 'big cock' and nipples, among other things.
What on earth would Carlson and Hoover have to say about that? And one wonders if O'Reilly was fully clothed when engaging in such titillating and unwanted conversations with Mackris? Were his legs spread? Was his booty covered? Were his moves overtly sexual?
Check for yourself: Read more here. And here. And here.
No comments:
Post a Comment