tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-558253513796745662.post1685560861654157762..comments2023-08-13T07:09:16.921-04:00Comments on Contextual Criticism: The Congressional Reform Act of 2011Lowellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15305748075301453010noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-558253513796745662.post-2670214984106857022011-10-29T13:26:28.282-04:002011-10-29T13:26:28.282-04:00I know you're too chicken to publish this sinc...I know you're too chicken to publish this since I know you people don't care for facts, but here are some anyway:<br /><br />Q: What about the "Congressional Reform Act of 2011"?<br /> <br />A: A viral e-mail calls for fixing some abuses and excesses that don’t exist, repeating misinformed claims that we’ve addressed before. <br /><br /><br />This latest rant against Congress has been circulating since the start of the year, urging passage of a "reform act" to correct abuses of power by Congress. But as we often find with these chain messages, the author doesn’t know very much about the subject.<br /> <br />He or she (the author is anonymous, of course) repeats a number of false claims that we have debunked before. The author:<br />Demands that members of Congress be forced to "participate in Social Security." But members of Congress already participate, paying Social Security payroll taxes just like nearly every other worker. Once upon a time that wasn’t true, but members of Congress were brought under Social Security way back in 1984. Yet bogus claims like this continue to circulate more than a quarter-century later, despite our best efforts.<br /><br />Urges that "Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose." But as we’ve explained before, the idea that Congress has exempted itself from many of its own laws is also somewhat out of date. A law enacted in 1995 applied 13 civil rights, labor, and workplace safety and health laws to Congress, removing the basis for earlier criticisms. It’s true that members of Congress retain a degree of immunity from arrest or prosecution, but changing that require an amendment to the Constitution, which grants that immunity in Article I, Section 6. (The authors of the Constitution didn’t want any president to try what King Charles I of England had done in 1642 — sending troops to arrest his critics in Parliament.) The message is confused, at first mentioning earlier constitutional amendments, but then describing the proposal as an "act," which refers to legislation.<br /><br />Recommends that "Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise." But Congress doesn’t do that now. Under current law, pay increases are determined by a cost-of-living formula, and they take effect automatically, unless Congress votes to stop them. And in fact, that’s what has happened for the past two years. Congress denied itself any pay raise in 2010 and in 2011, as we’ve reported.<br /><br />Calls for stripping members of Congress of their current health care benefits and forcing them to participate "in the same health care system as the American people." But which "system"? Most Americans are covered either by employer-sponsored health insurance or by various government-sponsored programs, such as Medicare for those age 65 and over or Medicaid for lower-income persons. Currently members of Congress have the same health insurance options as millions of other federal employees and retirees and their families. The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program gives them a wide choice of private insurance plans. And according to the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly 51 million persons in the U.S. had no health insurance at all in 2009 — just under 17 percent of the population. (The author may have been laboring under the false impression that Congress somehow "exempted" itself from the new health care law, a bit of nonsense that was based on a number of misrepresentations that we addressed last year.)<br /><br />(Cont. http://www.factcheck.org/2011/03/congressional-reform-act/)Markus Welbyhttp://www.linkedin.com/answers/technology/information-technology/information-security/TCH_ITS_ISC/217043-16953700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-558253513796745662.post-20388879452025610142011-08-05T11:54:46.988-04:002011-08-05T11:54:46.988-04:00I wonder if there is a way to get some of the sugg...I wonder if there is a way to get some of the suggestions even debated by our Congress. At any rate, I found it interesting and hope someone is trying to figure a way to correct the abuses of the current systemBob Porisnoreply@blogger.com